Union almost submitting. Summary of the lesson "Unions are simple and composite. Winning and subordinate unions."

Subordination unions The value is divided into two groups: functional-syntactic and semantic.

Functional syntactic unions Indicate the syntactic dependence of the apparent part from the main, without specifying the nature of this dependence. N. S. Vintagin emphasizes that it is with an indefinite semantic, that is, they can be used in various types of departing proposals, they include alliances what, to, as .

• He did not hear
• how The greedy shaft rises. (Putting-empty.)
• (A. S. Pushkin)
• Why Arap Your Arape
• Mlada loves the desideon,
• how The month loves the nights of Mole? (Puttingular comparative.)
• (A. S. Pushkin)
• His deserted corner
• Gave vinime as The time has come out. (Pressing time.)
• (A. S. Pushkin)

Semantic unions It is not only for the formal attachment of the pressing proposal to the main, but also to express certain semantic relationships.

Semantic subordinate unions are divided into the following groups:

1. Temporary unions: as, when, barely, until, only, only, as soon as, before, after, since. Express the temporary relationship of two events, situations.

• Pleasantly, when There are people in the world who want to help.
• (P. A. Pavlenko)
• When Torime, the road always seems longer.
• (D. N. Mamin-Sibiryak)
• As soon as I entered the edge of the forest, as immediately came across the boars ...
• (V. K. Arsenyev)

2. Evaluctive unions: what, to, as, like. Express the relationship explanations.

• I told the boys what I got lost, and hooked against them.
• (I. S. Turgenev)
• I want to,
• to To the bayonet
• equated feather.
• (V. V. Mayakovsky)
• Children feel who They love them.

Galkina-Fedoorak E. M., Raspopov I. P. and Lomov A. M. Do not include the Issuctive alliances to the group of semantic (to the semantic Rosenthal D. E. and Telenkov M. A.).

3. Target unions: to, if only, if only, in order (statute), in order to, so as to, with the purpose of. Transfer target relations. Pressing explains the content of the main part of the complex proposal.

• To Love the music, you must first listen to her.
• (D. D. Shostakovich)
• All silent to To hear the rustle of flowers.

4. Causes of Unions: as (that), because, for, insofar as, due to the fact that, thanks to, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, because of, because of, because of. Express causal relationships. The base or motive is marked in the apparent part, mainly a consequence.

• BUT as Upset mother was silent that Chuk with a hek was silent too.
• (A. P. Gaidar)
• Because of The clouds almost touched the tops of birches, on the ground was quiet and warm.
• (K. G. Powesty)

5. Conditional unions: if a, if, if, time, kaby., when, how soon. Transfer conditional relations marked in the apparent part, mainly - the result is shown.

• How well there could live all people in the world, if a Would they only wanted if a Would they just understood!
• (A. A. Fadeev)
• When Two people quarrel - always both to blame.
• (L. N. Tolstoy)

6. Sevective alliances - although, let be, lose, and that, for nothing, meanwhile,, although , as well as location and allied combinations no, like n. - express a gradious relationship. In the apparent part, the situation or event is described, contrary to which another event is carried out.

• This morning in the steppe was quiet, overcast, although The sun rose.
• (L. N. Tolstoy)
• No, you will not be enough for everyone,
• Though What a general you are.
• (A. T. Tvardovsky)
• Though He looked impossible,
• But also traces of Tatiana former
• He could not find onegin.
• (A. S. Pushkin)

7. Comparative unions: as, than, like, as if, like, for sure, rather than, as if, similar to. Comparative relations are transmitted through a complex proposal, which describes the similarity of two events, situations - real and expected.

• Similar to An impatient young man is waiting for the hour of date, I was waiting for an hour.
• (M. A. Bulgakov)
• Cool summer has come,
• Like New life began.
• (A. A. Akhmatova)

8. Investigative alliances: so that. In the dressing part, relations expressing the result, result, conclusions are transmitted, while the reason, the base is expressed in the main part.

• House stood on Kozochior, so that The windows in the garden were very low from the ground ...
• (S. T. Aksakov)
• The rain has stopped, so that We can go take a walk.

Many linguists tend to believe that investigative relations are transmitted only by the only union so that (Leklane P. A.). Meanwhile, Babayitseva V. V., Maksimov L. Yu., Vinogradov V.V. The Union is counted for this group. before that .

• AND before that I suddenly shame what Literally tears flowed down my cheeks ...
• (F. M. Dostoevsky)

The subordinate unions attach the pressing parts to the main parts of the complex proposal. Some subordination unions are used and when building a simple sentence. So, Soyuz as It may be placed in front of the registered part of the composite facility: House as a passage yardor enter the circumstance of the image: How smoke dispersed dreams (Lermontov), \u200b\u200bUnion to Can join the circumstance of the target expressed by the infinitive: Gathered to discuss the action plan.Wed: Gathered to discuss the action plan.

Communication unions are customary to divide on semantic and assembetic. The latter include unions that join the apparent claims: what, how, as if. They are usually compared with grammatical cases, since with the help of the extinct unions, such syntactic places are often replaced, in which grammatical case may be (I heard wind noise, it is heard that the wind is noisy; Spring is dreaming. Spring dreams. I remembered the happening. I remembered what happened). Like grammatical cases, the inexpressive unions expresses syntactic relations, predetermined (specified) semantics of the words (or word form), to which the apparent offer relates. An alreadynant union does not form a syntactic meaning of a complex proposal, but only expresses it.

However, it would be incorrect to think that in informatively anonymous unions are empty words. Evaluctive unions differ in the modal components of the value. Soyuz to Expresses the desired modality (Tell me to come), as if -uncertainty (I see that someone stands) that and as Related to real modality.

Semantic subordinate unions have eigenvalues. They determine the syntax relationships in the structure of a complex offer.

Semantic unions are divided into groups of meaning:

1) temporary unions when, before, after, barely ... as, as soon as, barely,

2) Causes because, because, since, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, as a result of the fact that;

3) conditional if, if ... then, if, if, if, provided that, if and etc.;

4) SEEDing despite the fact that, although, despite the fact that, contrary to what, with all that, no matter what;

5) Corollary so, as a result of;

6) goals to, in order to, in order to, then, to;

7) Comparative: as if, as if, as if, as well as, just like, like, as if;

8) comparative unions that coincide with the subordinate unions in a formal basis, and the meaning not opposed to writing alliances if ... then, while, while, how, whereas as, as ... themes. For example, Fathers did not go to each other, she had not yet seen Alexei, meanwhile(= a) young neighbors only about him (Pushkin).

Union words

Allied words (or relative pronouns) are the locomotive words of various parts of the speech used in the construction of a complex proposal in the role of a supervisory union. The subordination issued by the Union word is customary to be called relative.

The role of union words use the following lexemes: who, what, what, who, what, whose, where, where, from where, when, how, why, why, why, how much.

Unlike unions, allied words are members of the proposal, they can be put in a semantic question, and, importantly, they are introduced into the apparent parts based on syntactic relationships with other components. For example, in the proposal The most amazing was how quickly they agreed (Fadeev) word as forms phrase with adverb fast, which expresses the value of the degree, and therefore cannot be considered a union. Also the Union Word what -it is always either strong-relevant V.p. (Remember what you said in the morning), or I. p. Subject (It is difficult to understand what is happening).

The union feature of relative pronouns is based on different properties.

1. In the design of the appendant of the pronunciation of pronoun implement their questionative semantics and choose depending on what the question is to: We were asked who comes, what happened when the cold will come, why the planes do not fly, what summer is expected etc.

Note. Lexeme whenhe is the union, if attachment is attached.

2. If the apparent proposal relates to a noun or relative pronoun, then in the Union Word It is realized by its ability to be used anaphorically: most often it introduces the component mentioned in the main part: tell me about the letter you received; I am who you are waiting; We were there where you go; On the birch, which grows under my window, the dwarf fibers the nest.

Which are necessary for the connection of components in a complex sentence, homogeneous members in the proposal, as well as separate proposals in the same text.

In Russian, the class of union words and unions includes those words that are responsible for syntactic connections in a sentence or word form. Unlike the prepositions carrying out a service function in unity with case-based existing forms, this part of the speech is not only not related to the grammatical form of the words connected, but is generally indifferent to their belonging to any part of speech. The same can be connected as nouns (for example, " i have dad and mom") And verbs (" the boy sings and dances") Adjective (" girl beautiful and smart"), Adverbs and even those words that belong to different parts of speech. The only condition is the coincidence of their syntactic functions - for example: " write beautiful and without errors ».

Many unions and allied words should not be able to establish how much to identify and specify it. This is another of their distinctive ability to have no prepositions. The latter with a pelvic flexion not only reveal the connection, but at the same time it is formed.

Unions are not only not considered members of the sentence - they do not change. By origin, they are divided into derivatives - for example, so that In which you can trace a method of consignment with those a significant words, from which these unions were formed. Another specified is non-derivatives that are not related by origin in today's Russian language with other parts of speech. These are unions or, yes, and.

And according to the method of use, the following forms are allocated:

• non-refining or single - however, but;
• paired or double, for example, as ... and, if ... then;
• repeating - that and ... and, nor ... neither.

Based on the structure, alliances are divided into simple, which are written without spaces - a, forand composite- while, because.

In the nature of the syntactic relations expressed with their help are written and subordinate unions.

Writing species connect equal components - such as parts

In their meaning, writing allied words are:

• connectors that express the relationship of the listing - yes, and, too, and ... and, also;
• proponation, expressing opposition ratio - however, but, and, the same;
• separation, expressing the relationship of mutual computiation - or ... or, or, then ... then;
• explanatory, which express the attitude of the explanation - like that, it is;
• attachment expressing attachment - and also, yes.

Their other variety - subordinate unions - is designed to show the dependence of one component from the other, communicating with each other, mainly the links of a complex proposal. Sometimes they are used in simple sentences for inhomogeneous and homogeneous members.

For example, subordinate unions although, as if, as if.

Winter in winter is shorter than night. The lake is like a mirror.As you can see, the subordinate unions associate any members of the sentence. They can be both homogeneous and inhomogeneous.

Separate complex unions are used in such cases when there is a major and somewhat, for example, such words: who, where, what, who, whose, where, how much, from where, why, why, how much.

By parameter, the verification unions are the following discharges:

• causals - because since, for;
• temporary - when, only while, barely;
• target - in order to be in order to;
• conditional - if, kaba, if;
• issuctive - like that to;
• sEED - although; although;
• comparative - as if, exactly, as if;
• corollary - so that.

The syntax properties of the Union are divided into writing
and subordinates.

Writing alliances connect homogeneous members of a simple
Offers and parts of a complex sentence. Formal
A feature of the writing union is that
Waiting for connected components, it is not included in the syntax
The structure is not one of them. Whereas the subordinancy union belongs
Life of the pressing part, together with which it can take different positions

in relation to the main sentence: When the detachment entered
Rod, the sun was sake -\u003e The sun was sat down when the squad entered the city -\u003e
The sun when the detachment entered the city, sat down.

Writing alliances connect components as functionally
Equal: when written, it is impossible to single out the main thing nor
My parts. At the same time, homogeneity expressed by writing so
Zom, Nonodynakova. It may refer to the syntactic level -
The union connects the same members of the sentence: head Cat and Parrot;

maybe lexico-semantic - the union connects different forms
With their general or one-type reference orientation: i say
with poets and poets (V. 3. Sannikov); as well as communicative -
SUS combines functionally different members of the sentence: It is raining,
and strong; She will return, but no soon - adjective and adverb,
connected by the writing union to offer, read
Also as a proposal) 106.

Winning unions are divided into: 1) connecting, 2) dividing
, 3) interpreted, in which gradation is particularly isolated
4) connecting and 5) explanatory.

Note. This classification is traditional. She (with non-
significant variations) presented in many grammar
Russian language. B. 3. Sannikov offered the splitting of writing
unions are not on the basis of the syntax ratio, but on the basis of
range. He allocated connective, separation and
Unions. Connecting unions connect parts each of
which denotes the real / unreal fact. On the basis of
Alleal modality to connecting attributed and opposing
Unions (and also obviously should be attributed and explanatory
Unions). Separation unions are associated with modality
Fact fact. Subscribed related unions not ... A, which
indicate that only the second part of the syntax
Structures denotes a real fact: Petya does not sleep, but reads (Peter,
Instead of sleeping, reading) 107.

Connecting unions and nor ... nor, yes (in the meaning M), like ... so
«... and. These unions express a compound, not complicated
meaning, often they are used to designate enumerations
Niya: And my Mattroina did not have a pava, no crow (Wings); And the right
and boom, and the crap dagger gentle the winner years (Pushkin). Most.
Abandon from connecting unions is the Union and, which, in
According to A. M. Peshkovsky, expresses the "clean idea of \u200b\u200bthe connection." Soyuz
and Used not only to express enumeration and compound.

Read more about this: B. 3. Sannikov. Russian writing structures. Semanti
ka Pragmatics. Syntax. M., 1989. P. 13-25.

B. 3. Sannikov. Decree op. P. 92-97.

With support for adverbs, particles, modal words (and then, therefore,
and therefore, and it means, nevertheless, and yet, and nevertheless) as well as
the meaning of the united parts it can transmit temporary causes
but investigative, gradual, conditional, interconnected and
Dynaming values.

Separate unions or, or, then ... then. not that ... not that, or ... or,
either ... either, or even ... either, and then, and not that express two main synts
Taxi relationships: 1) Value of mutual exclusion: Whether she is -
Telegram - got into a snowdrobe and now lies deep under the snow, or
She fell on the trail and pulled it down any passersby ... (Gaidar), 2)
Priority: Then rain, then hail, then snow, like white down, then the sun,
Glitter, azure and waterfalls ... (Bunin); The heaven of the heaven of the sky. Whirlwinds
Clear: how the beast she will win, then pay like a child (Pushkin).

Note. B. 3. Sannikov noted the use of separation
Sign of Union and; On this value it gives an example from "stingy
Knight "Pushkin: Baron is healthy. God will give - ten years, twenty,
and twenty five. And thirty will live.

Promotional unions a, but, however, yes (in value but) are
multi-valued, the context can modify their content; OS-
The main meaning of the Union and comparative: Still in the fields white snow,
And the water is noisy (Tyutchev), unions but, however, yes - transcription
: She comes up - Dogs looked at the tears on the water. Hit
sobbing, in the chest, in the waves decided to drown - however, did not jump in the water
And Dale continued the way (Pushkin).

Gradation unions (they are also called double comparable
unions) not only but. not only ... but not only not ... but not
so much, .. how much, not even what et al. express comparison or
Contrasting for Sumpers: He is not only beautiful, but
And talented.

Connecting Unions yes, and yes, both, moreover, (and) moreover,
too, also Express additional information to what has been said: Water
It was a lot, and moreover she was not spoiled.

Explanatory unions namely, that is, or somehow express
Cheerful and refinement: Drank in ordinary, that is, a lot (Push-
kin); All day Anna spent at home, that is, the oblons ... (L. Tolstoy);

Pets, namely cats, act on a person soothing
Basically; She is called, that is, her penetment Manilovka, and Zamanyovka
There is no no (Gogol).

Note. In some works, the explanatory unions of the separation
from writing and recognized by lexems forming

Ibid. P. 197.

a special type of syntactic relationship, intermediate between sochi-
Relationship and supervisory relations.

Subordination unions

Supplemental unions attach the pressing parts to the head
parts of a complex proposal. Some subordinates
Unions are used and when building a simple sentence.
So, Soyuz as may be put in front of the registered part of the composite
Depressed: House as a passage yard or enter into the circumstance
actions: How smoke dispersed dreams (Lermontov), \u200b\u200bUnion to can
Attach the purpose of the target, expressed by the infinitive:

Gathered to discuss the action plan.Wed: Gathered to discuss the plan
actions.

The subordination unions are customary to divide on semantic and as-
Mantic. The latter include unions that attach
Identifying offers: what, how, as if. They usually
compared with grammatical cases, since with the help of an exposure
Syntactic places are often replaced by union,
in which there may be a grammatical case (Audio sound noise,
Heard that 1 like 1 like a wind noise; Spring dreams. Dreams like
Spring; I remembered what happened. I remembered what happened). Like gram
Matical cases of splashing unions express syntactic
Relations predetermined (specified) semantics of the word (or
Wordforums), to which the apparent offer relates. Exposure
The denial does not form the syntactic meaning of the complex
Fans, but only expresses it.

However, it would be wrong to think that in informative
Issuctive unions are empty words. Analyznaya Unions
differ in the modal components of the value. Soyuz
to Expresses the desired modality (Tell me to come),
As if - uncertainty (I see that someone stands) that and as connections
us with real modality.

Semantic subordinate unions have their own values.
. They determine the syntax relationships in the structure of complex
offers.

Semantic unions are divided into groups by meaning: 1)
unions when, before, after, barely ... as, as soon as
Almost only 2) Causes because, because, since, due to the
that, especially since, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, by
What, due to the fact that. due to the fact that, as a result of the fact that;

3) conditional if a. if ... then, if, if, if, provided
What, if and etc.; 3) Sustaining despite the fact that though, despite

what, in spite of what, with all that, no matter what
what; 4) Corollary so, as a result of; 5) goals to, in order
so that in order to, then so that; 6) Comparative
as if, as if, as if, as well as, just like, like that
how, as if; 7) comparative unions that coincide with the subordinate
union for a formal sign, and the value does not proceed
Announced writing unions if ... then, while
Doo what, whereas as, as they are ... For example, Fathers
did not go to each other, she had not yet seen Alexei, meanwhile
(= a) young neighbors only about him (Pushkin).

Notes. 1. Comparative unions, due to the fact that they are not
Syntactic inequality, sometimes included in the composition
written, especially in cases where it is possible to replace
Soyuz but 109. 2. Among comparative unions should be noted
Soyuz as, stubborn
In the function, synonymous pretext in quality (we know him as a teach
Tele 1 as a teacher). The specificity of the corresponding design
Cyound is that the union joins the noun,
The form of which is chosen based on the coordination: is he (I. p.)
like as a poet (I. p.), help him (D. p.) as a poet. (D. p.), tse
him is (V.p.) as a poet (V.p.), interested in them (T. p.) what is it in-
it is (T. p.), I will tell about him (P. p.) as a poet (P. p.) 110.

Union words

Allied words (or relative pronouns) is a place
Personal words of various parts of speech used in constructing
Completed proposal in the role of a supervisory union.
The subordination issued by the Union word is customary to be called
Belt.

The role of union words use the following lexemes: who what,
what, which, what, whose, where, where, from where, when, how, why, why,
Why, how much.

Unlike unions, allied words are members of the proposed
to them you can put a semantic question, and, what is important, they are
Fit to the apparent parts based on syntactic connection with others
components. For example, in the proposal The most amazing was that
how fast they agreed (Fadeev) word as forms phrases
with nashcham fast, which expresses the value of the degree, and
Could not be considered a union. Also the Union Word what -

109 Modern Russian. Part 2 / Ed. E. I.Dibrova. Pp. 148-149.

110 Read more about it. A. F. Prydykina. The Union "How" in the meaning "in quality". Vladivo-
Stoke, 1975.

it is always either strong-relevant V.p. (Remember that you spoke
rum), or I. p. Subject (It is difficult to understand what is happening).

The union feature of relative pronouns is based on
their properties. 1. In the design of the apparent extaste
Proponation proposals implement their questionative semantics
and choose depending on what the question is directed: Us
asked who comes what happened when the cold will come, why
do not fly airplanes what summer is expected etc.

Note. Lexeme when is the union if attached
Current time.

2. If the apparent offer relates to a noun
or with compliance pronoun, then in the union word is implemented
His ability to be used anahedorically: most often it introduces
In the appropriate proposal, the component mentioned in the main part:

tell me about the letter you received; I am who you are waiting; we were
where you go; On the birch, which grows under my window, ducky
nest.

Note. Relative pronouns-adjectives
The Research Institute of Putting Residues and Consisions are consistent with
nouns in the main part to which they relate, and
MA of the case is determined by their place in the structure of the apparent offer
. Cm. The places for which they drove could not be called
picturesque (Turgenev) - a proposed-case for which
predefined syntactic bond with verb drove (where
Passage? - Drove ...) and the number is determined by the coordination
with word formal places.

Soyuz

Soyuz - This is the service part of speech, which serves to communicate homogeneous members of the sentence, parts of a complex proposal, as well as certain proposals in the text. Unions do not change and are not members of the sentence.

Of Educationunions are:

1) non-derivative (primitive), that is, such that are not related by origin with other parts of speech: a, but, or, yes, and;

2) derivatives (undeveloped) formed:

Connection of non-derivatives: as if,

Connection of the indicative word from the main part and simple union: in order to,

Connection of the Union with a word with a generalized meaning: as long as, while

Historically, other parts of speech: so far, although to.

By structure distinguish alliances:

1) Simple, consisting of one word: a, for, to;

2) composite consisting of several components: since, while.

By consumption Unions are divided into:

1) Single (non-repeating): But, however, but, but

2) repeated, which consist of the same parts ( neither ... neither, then ... then, or ... or, or ... either).

3) Double (two-component) unions, parts of which are distant with a mandatory or not mandatory second part: not so much ... how much, not only ... but also; if ... then when ... then, barely ... how.

By the nature of the syntax relationship, The unions are divided into: 1) Writing: and, but, even, but, however;

2) Supporting: Although, if, therefore.

Writing Unions Connect equal components. They associate homogeneous members of the sentence, part of a complex offer, sentences in the text.

Writing alliances depending on the transmitted meanings are combined into categories.

Classification of writing unions by value

Name	Unions	Examples
Connectors	and, yes (\u003d and), too, also, nor ... and etc.	1. Dryly cracked grasshoppers, and lulls and worries this whisper-crash(I. Bunin). 2. Peter got up, I also rose.
Dividing	or, or, then ... then, not that ... not thatand etc.	1. Harnessed the horse, dropped two on the cart or Three knots, bed and wooden topchak - that's all the household(V. Rasputin). 2. That cold, that very hot, that The sun hide thatshines too bright(I. Wings).
Advisory	a, but yes (\u003d but), however, butand etc.	1. I will laugh with everyone but I don't want to cry with anyone(M. Lermontov). 2. They are picking up, drive home from the cold, but We are not leaving(V. Astafiev).
Gradation	not only ... But, not so much ... how much, not that ... and, etc.	I.E. Repin more than once argued that Leonid Andreev not only outside but also The character reminds him of one of the charming Russian writers - Garshina(K. Chukovsky).
Explanatory	that is, namely, or (\u003d that is) and etc.	He belonged to the number of young people who played a tetanus on every exam, i.e did not answer a word to professor questions (I. Turgenev).
Attachments	yes, and happeach, and etc.	When the exhausted musicians stopped playing, the excitement caused by the music disappeared and I felt that I was about to drop, yes I. Would have fallen, do not happen in time(V. Garin).

Subordination unions Combine non-equivance components and indicate the dependence of one of these components from the other. They are mainly associated with part of a complex proposal, but can also be used in a simple proposal for communicating homogeneous members: The book is interesting, although a little tightened. Unions as, as if like associated homogeneous and inhomogeneous members of the sentence: In winter, the night is longer than day; The pond is like a mirror.

The discharge of subordinate unions are varied.

Classification of verification unions by value

	Name	Unions	Examples
	Issuctive	what is that and etc.	1. It seemed what Multicolored Loskutka rolls on the ground(Yu. Olesh). 2. My goal was to to be on the old street(I. Bunin).
	Temporary	when, while, since, just, barely and etc.	1. The first blow of the bell rang in the frosty air, whenMakar entered the hut(V. Korolenko). 2. So it will be wedge the hut, until will not fall at all or not wait for a good owner(V. Rasputin).
	Causes	because, because, because, due to the fact that, due to the fact that and etc.	And now it was difficult for a foreign aliens to fight a silent dude, because She was a blind boy accompanied by the whole related Ukrainian nature(V. Korolenko).
	Target	to, in order to and etc.	1. Then, to Removing yourself for a smart day, passengers got confused together with sailors in the cabin companies(I. Bunin). 2. In order to bring up real men, you need to educate real women(V. Sukhomlinsky).
	Conditional	if, if, if ... then, whether and etc.	If a You will successfully choose a job and put your soul in it, that Happiness will delete you(K. Ushinsky).
	Sustained	despite the fact that though and etc.	1. Once was to admire the view although The view of this deserved(Yu. Olesh). 2. The horse began to get tired, and with him Sft Him, althoughhe was remembered by the belt in the snow(A. Pushkin).
	Comparative	as if, as if, as if, how, exactly and etc.	The flame appeared in one second, as if Someone allowed in the crowd of solar bunnies(Yu. Olesh). Comparative unions can adopt comparative turnover: Thunder jumped, asball and rolled in the wind(Yu. Olesh).
	Corollary	so that	Everything goes according to plan, so that Act boldly.

These examples of subordinate unions can be supplemented with composite subordinate unions, for example: while, as if, only only, due to the fact that et al. (See above). Some unions are meaningful and can be attributed to several discharges, for example to (target and explicit), when (temporary and conditional).