Methodology for determining neuropsychic stability and the risk of maladaptation under stress “Forecast”23. Test for diagnosing the level of neuropsychic stability, the risk of maladaptation under stress Tests for neuropsychic stability
Methodology "Forecast" developed at LVMA named after. CM. Kirov and is intended for the initial identification of persons with signs of neuropsychic instability (NPU), the risk of maladjustment under stress. The method contains 84 questions, each of which is asked to answer “yes” or “no”.
When preventing and diagnosing an emotional state, special importance is attached to the so-called neuropsychic instability, which is a reflection of both the mental and somatic level of the individual’s health. NPU shows the risk of personality maladjustment under stress, that is, when the system of emotional reflection functions under critical conditions caused by external as well as internal factors.
Methodology "Forecast" allows us to identify individual pre-morbid signs of personality disorders, as well as assess the likelihood of their development and manifestations in human behavior and activity. It is especially informative when selecting persons suitable for work or service in difficult, unpredictable conditions, where increased demands are placed on a person.
You must answer 84 yes or no questions within 30 minutes. Analysis of the answers can clarify individual biographical information, behavioral characteristics and states of mental activity in various situations.
Instructions:
“You are offered a test of 84 questions, to each of which you must answer “yes” or “no.” The proposed questions relate to your well-being, behavior or character. There are no “right” or “wrong” answers here, so don’t try to think about them for a long time - answer based on what best suits your condition or ideas about yourself. If your answer is yes, then fill in the box with the answer “yes” above the number of the corresponding question; if the answer is no, then fill in the rectangle with the answer “no”. If you find it difficult to answer, then fill in both rectangles, which corresponds to the answer “I don’t know.”
Questionnaire text:
1. Sometimes such bad thoughts come into my head that it’s better about. don't tell them to anyone.
2. I rarely have constipation (or never at all).
3. From time to time I have attacks of laughter or crying that I cannot cope with.
4. There are times when I don’t keep my promises.
5. I often have a headache.
6. Sometimes I tell lies.
7. Once a week or more often, I feel hot throughout my body for no apparent reason.
8. It happened that I talked about things that I don’t understand.
9. It happens that I get angry.
10. Now it’s hard for me to hope that I will achieve anything in life.
11. It happens that I put off until tomorrow what needs to be done today.
12. I willingly take part in meetings and other social events.
13. The most difficult struggle for me is the struggle with myself.
14. I rarely experience muscle cramps and twitches (or not at all).
15. Sometimes, when I don't feel well, I get irritable.
16. I am rather indifferent to what will happen to me.
17. At a party, I behave better at the table than at home.
18. If I don’t face a fine and there are no cars nearby, I can cross the street where I want, and not where I’m supposed to.
19. I think that my family life is as good as that of most of my friends.
20. People often tell me that I am short-tempered.
21. As a child, I had a company where everyone always tried to stand up for each other in everything.
22. In the game I prefer to win.
23. For the last few years, I have been feeling good most of the time.
24. Now my weight is constant (I am neither gaining weight nor losing weight).
25. I am pleased to have significant friends among my acquaintances; it kind of gives me weight in my own eyes.
26. I would be quite calm if anyone in my family was in trouble.
27. There is something wrong with my mind.
28. I am worried about sexual (gender) issues.
29. When I try to say something, I often notice that my hands are shaking.
30. My hands are as dexterous and agile as before.
31. Among my friends there are people I don’t like.
32. I think that I am a doomed person.
33. I quarrel with my family members very rarely.
34. It happens that I gossip a little with someone.
35. I often see dreams that it’s better not to tell anyone about.
36. It happens that when discussing some issues, I don’t think much and agree with the opinions of others.
37. At school, I learned the material more slowly than others.
38. In general, my appearance suits me.
39. I am quite confident in myself.
40. Once a week or more often I get very excited or anxious.
41. Someone controls my thoughts.
42. I drink an unusual amount of water every day.
43. It happens that an indecent or even obscene joke makes me laugh.
44. I am happiest when I am alone.
45. Someone is trying to influence my thoughts.
46. I love Andersen's fairy tales.
47. Even among people, I usually feel lonely.
48. I get angry when people rush me.
49. I am easily confused.
50. I easily lose patience with people.
51. I often want to die.
52. It happened that I quit something I started because I was afraid that I couldn’t handle it.
53. Almost every day something happens that scares me.
54. I am indifferent to questions of religion; it does not interest me.
55. I rarely have attacks of bad mood.
56. I deserve severe punishment for my actions.
57. I have had very unusual mystical experiences.
58. My beliefs and views are unshakable.
59. I have periods when I lose sleep due to anxiety.
60. I am a nervous and excitable person.
61. It seems to me that my sense of smell is the same as that of others (no worse).
62. Everything works out badly for me, not as it should.
63. I almost always feel dry in my mouth.
64. I feel tired most of the time.
65. Sometimes I feel like I'm close to a nervous breakdown.
66. It really annoys me that I forget where I put things.
67. I am very careful about how I dress.
68. I like adventure stories more than love stories.
69. It is very difficult for me to adapt to new conditions of life, work, the transition to any new conditions of life, work, study seems unbearably difficult.
70. It seems to me that people especially often treat me unfairly.
71. I often feel unfairly offended.
72. My opinion often does not coincide with the opinions of others.
73. I often feel tired of life, and I don’t feel like living.
74. People pay attention to me more often than to others.
75. I have headaches and dizziness due to worry.
76. I often have periods when I don’t want to see anyone.
77. It is difficult for me to wake up at the appointed time.
78. If someone is to blame for my failures, I will not leave him unpunished.
79. As a child, I was moody and irritable.
80. I know of cases when my relatives were treated by neurologists and psychiatrists.
81. Sometimes I take valerian, elenium and other sedatives.
82. Among my close relatives there are people who have been prosecuted.
83. I have been brought to the police.
84. I studied poorly at school, there were times when they wanted to keep me (retained) for the second year.
Processing test results:
The indicator on the NPU scale is obtained by simply summing up the positive and negative responses that match the “key”.
Key
- Sincerity scale: No (-): 1,4,6,8,9, 11,16,17, 18, 22,25, 31,34,36,43
- Neuropsychic stability scale: Yes (+): 3,5,7,10,15, 20, 26, 27, 29, 32, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50,51 ,52,53,56, 57, 59, 60, 62,63, 64,65,66, 67,69, 70,71,72, 73, 74, 75,76,77,78,79,80,81 .82, 83.84; No (-):2,12,13,14, 19,21,23,24, 28, 30, 38, 39, 46,54,55,58, 61,68
Interpretation:
| Points | |
| 29 or more | High probability of neuropsychic breakdowns. |
| 14-28 | Neuropsychic breakdowns are likely, especially in extreme conditions. |
| 13 or less | Neuropsychic breakdowns are unlikely. |
Converting raw points into a 10-point score
| Score by | Sum of answers | NPU Group | Forecast |
| 5 or less | high NPU | Favorable |
|
| high NPU | Favorable |
||
| good NPU | Favorable |
||
| 9-10 | good NPU | Favorable |
|
| 11-13 | good NPU | Favorable |
|
| 14-17 | satisfactory NPU | Favorable |
|
| 18-22 | satisfactory NPU | Favorable |
|
| 23-28 | satisfactory NPU | Favorable |
|
| 29-32 | unsatisfactory NPU | Adverse |
|
| 33 or more | unsatisfactory NPU | Adverse |
Literature:Workshop on the psychology of states: textbook. allowance / Ed. prof. A. O. Prokhorova. – St. Petersburg: Rech, 2004. – 480 p.
Questionnaire for assessing neuropsychic stability Forecast. The Forecast questionnaire was developed at the Military Medical Academy. Be frank, do not think for a long time about the content of the questions, give a natural answer that... Question 23 Questionnaire Forecast indicate the number of statements. He needs to answer each question yes or no, while marking his answer in a certain way. The Forecast methodology was developed at LVMA named after. Antoinette, daughter of the future French President
Stimulus material 60 questions and answer sheet. The questionnaire contains 86 questions, to each of which the subject must answer yes. Carefully ensure that the question number of the questionnaire and the number. Only at first glance does it seem complicated; you read the question and choose an answer. Rybnikov's forecast2 is intended to determine the level. If your answer is yes, then fill in the rectangle with the answer yes above the number of the corresponding question if the answer. Count the number of No answers to the questions specified in the key for the sincerity scale
Be frank, do not think for a long time about the content of the questions, give a natural answer that first comes to your mind. Rybnikova Forecast2 is intended to determine the level of neuropsychiatric. Psychological test: Your mental stability. The method contains 84 questions, each of which is asked to answer yes or no. Score on a 10-point scale sum of answers on the scale NPU group NPU prognosis 10 5 and the least highest NPU suitable 8 78. Questionnaire for assessing neuropsychic stability Forecast2. Be frank, don’t think for a long time about the content of the questions, give a natural answer
Questions and answers are encrypted in advance. The place of birth is indicated in the Gorky region. Questionnaire ssr1 questions and answers. Question 23 Questionnaire Forecast indicate the number of statements, answers to them, list the scales. Pay close attention to the question number of the questionnaire and the number of the registration cell. The value of which is determined by the number of correct answers, etc. The questionnaire contains 84 questions, to each of which the subject is asked to answer yes
It happened that when discussing certain issues, I especially did not. Pay close attention to the survey question number and cell number.
Proposed by P.I. Yunatskevich.
Registration form
Instructions: We ask you to answer the questions below. Please highlight your answer in the appropriate box on the registration form.
Full Name ____________________________________________
|
Do you think life can lose value for a person in some situations? | |||
|
Is life sometimes worse than death? | |||
|
In the past, I attempted to take my own life. | |||
|
Many people love, understand and appreciate me. | |||
|
It is possible to justify hopelessly ill people who choose voluntary death. | |||
|
I don't think I can find myself in a hopeless situation. | |||
|
The meaning of life is not always clear; it can sometimes be lost or found. | |||
|
Do you think that if you find yourself in a situation where your loved ones betray you, you can move on with your life? | |||
|
I sometimes think about my voluntary death. | |||
|
In any situation, I will fight for my life, no matter what the cost. |
Key
The total number of answers that match the key is calculated.
"Yes" (+) :1,2, 3, 5, 7, 9
“No” (-): 4, 6, 8, 10.
The estimated suicide risk coefficient (Sr) is calculated using the formula:
Sr = (N/ 10), where
N – number of matches with the key.
Sr indicators can vary from 0 to 1. Indicators close to 1 – high level of propensity to suicidal reactions, close to 0 – low level of propensity to suicidal reactions.
Interpretation
Assessing the level of suicidal tendencies:
up to 0.2 – low (5 points)
0.2 – 0.3 – below average (4 points)
0.4 – 0.5 – average (3 points)
0.6 – 0.7 – above average (2 points)
0.8 or more – high (1 point)
5.11. Questionnaire “Deviant Behavior”
The technique is intended to identify a tendency towards deviant (addictive and delinquent) behavior.
The questionnaire consists of 60 questions and includes 4 blocks of questions aimed at identifying military-professional orientation (block “Military-professional orientation”), studying the tendency to addictive (block “Addictive Behavior”) and addictive (block “Dilectness”) behavior , as well as the level of suicidal predisposition (block “Suicidal risk”) of the examined persons.
Questionnaire
Instructions: You will be asked 60 questions relating to some of your individual psychological characteristics. There are 4 answer options on the registration form. You need to carefully read the question and choose the answer that suits you best. All answers to questions are recorded on the registration form. There is only one answer possible for each question.
1. I understood the instructions for this technique well.
2. People with whom I try to be on friendly terms very often hurt me.
3. I am completely unsuited to military service and this scares me very much.
4. “For company” with friends, I can drink a large amount of alcohol.
5. I believe that in some situations life can lose value for a person.
6. I am convinced that men should serve in the army (navy) only of their own free will.
7. I can be tough and cruel with others.
8. Sometimes my friends managed to experience unusual states: seeing colorful visions, hearing strange sounds, etc.
9. I think that the greatest difficulties for me during my service were the need to obey my commanders.
10. Among my friends there were those who led the wrong lifestyle.
11. It seems to me that those around me do not understand me well, do not appreciate me, or even dislike me.
12. Lately I have noticed that I have started smoking a lot. This somehow helps me, distracts me from worries and worries.
13. It happened that in the morning my hands would tremble, and my head would simply “split.”
14. I have always strived for friendship with peers who were older than me in age.
15. I can’t force myself to quit smoking, although I know it’s harmful.
16. I don't like it when someone bosses me around. This makes me feel protest.
17. In a state of aggression, I am capable of a lot.
18. It is not easy for me to adapt to new living conditions.
19. Among my close relatives (father, mother, brothers, sisters) there were convicted persons.
20. I often experienced a feeling of weightlessness of my body, detachment from the world around me, and the unreality of what was happening.
21. The upbringing of young people is influenced by so many reasons that the efforts of parents and teachers are often in vain.
22. If someone is to blame for my troubles, I will find a way to “repay” him.
23. The friends with whom I am on friendly terms do not like my parents and relatives.
24. I believe that people who choose voluntary death can be justified.
26. In civilian life, I drank alcohol once a week or more often.
27. If someone has done me harm, I consider it obligatory to repay him in kind.
29. I do not condemn young men who evade military service.
30. The meaning of life is not always clear, sometimes it can be lost.
31. I have friends who like to “watch cartoons” after taking various substances.
32. Where I lived, there were youth groups actively fighting with each other.
33. It is more important for me to serve “calmly” in a “quiet place” than to carry out serious and dangerous command assignments.
34. Recently, in order not to “break down”, I was forced to take sedatives.
35. I have been trying to break free from some bad habits.
36. I do not condemn people who attempt to die.
37. When drinking alcohol, I often exceeded my limit.
38. My parents and relatives expressed concerns about my drinking.
39. I feel more and more frustrated with my military service.
40. It is unlikely that I will want to devote my entire life to the military profession (stay for extended service, enter a military school).
41. I've been feeling stressed lately. Therefore, I took Tazepam, Elenium and other sedatives.
42. A person’s choice of voluntary death in ordinary life can certainly be justified.
43. Our school (college) adopted a ritual of “registration” of newcomers, in which I willingly took part.
44. Lately I have been feeling depressed; the future seems hopeless to me.
45. I had troubles during my studies (at work) due to drinking alcohol.
46. During my service, I will try to avoid performing complex and responsible command assignments.
47. It is unpleasant for me to remember and talk about some cases that were associated with alcohol consumption.
48. My friends know how to “relax” well and have fun.
49. The oath of allegiance to the Fatherland has lost its relevance in modern conditions.
50. You can agree that I am not very inclined to comply with many laws, considering them unreasonable.
51. Among my close friends there were those who often left home, wandered, etc.
52. I believe that my father abused (abuses) alcohol.
53. I like to gamble. They give you the opportunity to “shake yourself up”, “to catch your chance”.
54. I understand people who do not want to move on with their lives if they are betrayed by their family and friends.
55. I don't judge friends who smoke weed.
56. There is nothing reprehensible that people try to experience some unusual states.
57. I think that any provision of laws and military regulations can be interpreted in two ways.
58. My friends often avoided educational activities, considering them boring.
59. In our family there have been cases of voluntary death (or attempted death).
60. I can no longer cope with some of my habits, even if I really want to.
Registration form
|
No, it's not this way |
Perhaps so |
Right |
Absolutely right |
No, it's not this way |
Perhaps so |
Right |
Absolutely right |
||
Processing the results: The results are processed for each block separately using “keys”, as well as for the entire method as a whole, by summing the points. In this case, the answers are evaluated as follows:
0 – no, this is not true;
1 – perhaps so;
2 – true;
3 – absolutely true.
Key
VPN – military professional level: 3, 6, 9, 16, 18, 29, 33, 39, 40,46,49.
ADP – level of propensity for addictive behavior: 4, 8, 12, 13, 15, 20, 26, 28, 31, 34, 35, 37, 38, 41, 45, 47, 48, 52, 53, 55, 56, 60.
DP – level of propensity for delinquent behavior: 7, 10, 14, 17, 19, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 32, 43, 50, 51, 57, 58.
SR - suicide risk level: 2, 5, 11, 24, 30, 36, 42, 44, 54, 59.
During further processing, the “raw” values on all four scales (VPN, ADP, DP, SR) are summed up and a total score is determined (propensity for deviant forms of behavior), which is then translated into a 10-point scale of normal distribution (stans) and conditional categories of professional suitability.
Converting “raw” points into stans
|
Name of scales of the DAP technique | |||||||||||
|
Walls |
|||||||||||
|
Integral assessment: Deviant behavior | |||||||||||
|
Military professional orientation (VPN) | |||||||||||
|
Addictive behavior (ADB) | |||||||||||
|
Delinquent Behavior (DB) | |||||||||||
|
Suicide risk (SR) | |||||||||||
Interpretation
|
Interpretation of high values (10 – 8 walls) |
Interpretation of averages (3 – 7 walls) |
Interpretation low values (2 – 1 walls) |
|
|
High and sufficient level of military professional orientation. |
Having a desire to serve in the Armed Forces. Ability to obey the requirements of commanders and superiors. Willingness to perform official duties, including under special operating conditions. Average level |
military-professional orientation. |
|
|
Having a desire to serve in the Armed Forces. Forced submission to the demands of commanders and superiors. |
Low level of military-professional orientation. Lack of desire to serve in the Armed Forces. Reluctance to obey the demands of commanders and superiors. |
No signs of addictive behavior. |
|
|
Absence of obvious signs of addictive behavior. |
Presence of signs of addictive behavior. |
Experience of drinking alcohol (possibly experience of using drugs). |
|
|
No signs of delinquent behavior. |
Focus on compliance with generally accepted standards of behavior, group and corporate requirements. |
Absence of obvious signs of delinquent behavior. Generally accepted standards of behavior are observed. |
5.12. Presence of signs of delinquent behavior.
Aggressiveness. Failure to comply with socially approved norms of behavior.
No suicidal risk.
Suicidal tendencies are not expressed.
Presence of signs of suicidal predisposition.
Predictive questionnaire of conflict and role in the opposition for military personnel (POKROV)
The POKROV method is intended to predict:
conflict and the most likely role of opposing parties in the process of a possible conflict;
success of professional activity;
tendencies towards suicidal actions.
The present division of opponents of the conflict is to a certain extent arbitrary, however, it allows us to predict the main tendencies of the subject in a likely conflict with his participation. In this regard, the questionnaire predicts:
the likelihood of participation in conflicts with the predominant tendencies of the aggressor - scale “A”;
the likelihood of participation in conflicts with the predominant tendencies of the victim - “P” scale;
equal probability of participation in conflicts with the predominant tendencies of the victim-aggressor - scales “A”, “P”;
suicidal tendencies – “P” scale;
normal adaptation in interpersonal relationships, low conflict and suicidality - “K” scale;
sincerity in relation to research – “L” scale.
This technique allows not only to predict the behavior of a serviceman, but also to establish the role of opponents in the conflict that occurred when the command lacks information, which makes it possible to choose the right strategy in the process of investigations conducted in units in cases of hazing.
The undoubted advantage of the questionnaire is its secrecy, i.e. by the nature of the statements that make up the methodology, it is impossible to guess the goals facing the researcher. The work of the subjects is strictly individual and does not allow communication during the research process. The objectives of the study are not disclosed.
Questionnaire
Instructions: Read each statement carefully and mark “YES” or “+” next to its serial number on the registration form if it applies to you;
sign “NO” or “-” if not suitable; sign “0” if you cannot give a definite answer. Attention! For statements marked in the questionnaire with a “!” (1 – 20, 24, 50, 53, 54, 64, 73, 78), it is necessary to give only unambiguous answers “YES” or “NO”. Vague answers (“0”) can be given to other statements, but no more than 15 times.
1. ! As a child, I was a lively, energetic child.
2. ! As a child, I was mischievous, combative, and desperate.
3. ! As a child, I was an attention-seeking, boastful person.
4. ! I sometimes brag a little.
5. ! As a child, I was stubborn.
6. ! I am stubborn sometimes.
7. ! As a child, I was modest, indecisive, shy, timid.
8. ! As a child, I was withdrawn and uncommunicative.
9. ! As a child, I sometimes had outbursts of strong, uncontrollable excitement for sometimes insignificant reasons.
10.! I behaved rudely at home and school, or sometimes ran away from home.
12.! At times I fell behind in my studies (at school, vocational technical school, technical school).
13.! In my family there were frequent conflicts due to excessive drinking by one of the parents or their extreme intemperance.
14.! Until I was seven years old, I was raised only by my mother.
15.! Until I was seven years old, I grew up without parents.
16.! My parents live separately.
17.! My parents loved me very much, spoiled me, and allowed me a lot.
18.! My parents raised me very strictly or, on the contrary, they did not educate me and I was left to my own devices.
19.! I suffered severe head injuries after which I was in the hospital or was unwell for a long time.
20.! As a child, I grew up sickly and often suffered from colds.
21. I feel unwell after being upset.
22. My mood deteriorates from anticipation of possible troubles, worry about loved ones, and lack of self-confidence.
23. My mood depends very much on the company in which I am.
24.! I sometimes laugh at indecent jokes.
25. My sleep is rich in vivid dreams
26. I can regulate my sleep.
27. I wake up easily when I need to.
28. I have a good appetite, but I'm not a glutton.
29. At times I drink willingly, at times I am not drawn to alcohol.
30. Alcoholic drinks scare me.
31. Sexual desire worries me little.
32. My shyness really bothers me.
33. I would never forgive betrayal.
34. For me, the main thing is that clothes are neat, comfortable and clean.
35. I often feel like people around me judge me for the way I dress.
36. Lack of money annoys me.
37. I don’t like to calculate all expenses in advance; I easily borrow money, even if I know that it will be difficult for me to repay on time.
38. If they borrowed money from me, I am embarrassed to remind you about it.
39. I am very afraid to be left without my parents.
40. I love my mother very much and I’m afraid that something will happen to her.
41. My parents oppressed me too much and imposed their will in everything.
42. For me, not just one friend is important, but a friendly, good team.
43. I appreciate a friend who knows how to listen to me, encourage me, instill confidence, and calm me down.
44. I feel so sick that I have no time for friends.
45. I have no desire to have a friend.
46. People around me envy me and therefore hate me.
47. I quarrel easily and make up quickly.
48. I am shy around strangers and afraid to be the first to speak.
49. I can’t stand loneliness and always strive to be among people.
50.! I always answer letters after reading them.
51. I am convinced that all my wishes and plans will come true in the future.
52. I don’t like to think a lot about my future.
53.! I am completely free from any prejudices.
54.! I don't put off until tomorrow what I can do today.
55. I love changes in life - new experiences, new people, new surroundings.
56. I am afraid of changes in life; new surroundings frighten me.
57. New things are pleasant if only they promise something good for me.
58. I experience my failures myself and don’t look for sympathy or help from anyone.
59. I love all sorts of adventures, I even willingly take risks.
60. I don’t like adventures and avoid risks.
61. I only like adventures that are fun and those that end well, but I don’t like to take risks.
62. I weigh the pros and cons a lot and still don’t dare take risks.
63. It happens that risk and excitement completely intoxicate me.
64.! I prefer to win more than to lose.
65. I like to be the first in the company, to lead and guide others.
66. There are always people who listen to me and recognize my authority.
67. I don’t listen to objections and criticism and always do things my way.
68. I try to respond correctly to criticism.
69. I willingly listen to those instructions that concern my health.
70. I try to listen to useful instructions, but I don’t always succeed.
71. I always follow rules and laws.
72. As a child, I was like all children and was no different from my peers.
73.! As a child, I always did immediately and without complaint what was ordered.
74. I attended school regularly and always participated in community work.
75. At school, I tried to complete all assignments carefully.
76. I lack cold prudence.
77. I suffer from not being understood.
78.! I've never lied in my life.
Registration form
No - "-"
I can’t give a definite answer – “0”
Statements marked with a “!” (1 – 20, 24, 50, 53, 54, 64, 73, 78), it is necessary to give only unambiguous answers “YES” or “NO”. Vague answers (“0”) can be given to other statements, but no more than 15 times.
Key
Stage 1. At the end of the work, the sum of raw points for each scale (“L”, “A”, “P”, “K”) is calculated in accordance with the table below. Answers scored as “0” are not taken into account in the calculation. Attention! 9 points are added to the sum of the raw points on the “K” scale.
The results of the method are considered reliable if the “L” scale does not exceed 10 points.
Attention! If the sum of raw points on the “K” scale exceeds the sum of points on the “A” scale and on the “P” scale, a conclusion is made about the normal adaptation of the subject in interpersonal relationships, low conflict and the absence of suicidal risk. In this case, no further calculation is performed.
|
Scores on scales |
Scores on scales |
||||||||||||||||
|
"Yes", "+" |
"No", "-" |
"Yes", "+" |
"No", "-" |
||||||||||||||
Stage 2. It is necessary to compare the indicators obtained on three scales (“A”, “P”, “K”). When comparing, the emphasis is on the largest indicators (if the indicators are not equal).
For example:
Results on the “A” scale – 81 points, on the “P” scale – 73 points, on the “K” scale – 66 points. Therefore, when comparing, we get: A>P (81>73), A>K (81>66), P>K (73>66);
Results on the “A” scale – 81 points, on the “P” scale – 81 points, on the “K” scale – 66 points. Therefore, when comparing we get: A=P (81=81), A>K (81>66), P>K (81>66)
Stage 3. It is necessary to identify combinations of inequalities (maximum three combinations can be identified). In our examples:
1 example 2 example
1. (A>P) and (P>K) 1. (A=P) and (A>K)
2. (A>P) and (A>K) 2. (A=P) and (P>K)
3. (P>K) and (A>K) 3. (A>K) and (P>K)
Stage 4. Determine the role position in accordance with the role position diagnostic matrix below (based on the intersections of inequalities).
A– forecast of the role position of the aggressor;
P– forecast of the role position of the victim and the suicide;
P/A– forecast of the role position of the victim-aggressor and suicide;
TO– forecast of the role position of a non-conflict person;
N– the prognosis is not determined.
In our first example:
1. At the intersections (A>P) and (P>
2. Based on the intersections (A>P) and (A>K), the role position A is obtained - aggressor;
3. At the intersections (P>K) and (A>
Based on this, a conclusion is given on the forecast of the role position: “The victim is an aggressor (with a predominance of aggressive traits), prone to suicidal actions.”
In the following example:
1. Based on the intersections (A=P) and (A>K), the role position P/A is obtained – victim-aggressor and suicide;
2. Based on the intersections (A=P) and (P>K), the role position P/A is obtained – victim-aggressor and suicide;
3. At the intersections (A>K) and (P>K) the role position P/A is obtained - victim-aggressor and suicide.
Based on this, a conclusion is given on the forecast of the role position: “The victim is an aggressor with an equal probability of participating in conflicts, both as an aggressor and as a victim. (Not prone to suicidal actions, because the value of the K scale is less than the values on the A and P scales).
Stage 5. It is necessary to establish the probability of the resulting forecast. To do this, we calculate the scale difference indicators using the algorithm “subtract the smaller from the larger” and set the maximum excess of any of the scales over the “K” scale. We evaluate the result using the table below.
In our first example:
A-K = 81-66 = 15
A-P = 81-73 = 8
P-K = 73-66 = 7
Consequently, the “A” scale has the maximum excess over the “K” scale, because difference (A-K) = 15, which is greater than difference (P-K), which is 7.
In our second example:
A-K = 81-66 = 15
A-P = 81-81 = 0
P-K = 81-66 = 15
Therefore, the maximum excess over the “K” scale is 15 (both on the “A” and “P” scales).
In our examples, the maximum excess on the “K” scale is 15 points, therefore, the percentage of forecast reliability is 95-98%, which is interpreted as a high estimate of the forecast probability and a high degree of risk.
Stage 6. Based on the survey results, we determine recommendation codes according to the table below.
|
Forecast probability | ||||
|
(degree of risk) | ||||
|
Reliable | ||||
|
Significant | ||||
|
Presumable | ||||
|
Uncertain | ||||
|
Needs special medical and pedagogical measures. Possible mental disorders. If the “P” scale is exceeded: a high degree of probability of suicidal behavior. |
|
|
Needs strict control from commanders. If the “P” scale is exceeded: a significant degree of probability of suicidal behavior. |
|
|
Needs isolation by dispersing into different departments from persons with presumable and high degrees of likelihood of participating in hazing. If the “P” scale is exceeded: a significant degree of probability of suicidal behavior. |
|
|
Subject to close monitoring to clarify trends identified during the research process. If the “P” scale is exceeded: the estimated degree of probability of suicidal behavior. |
|
|
Needs isolation by dispersing into different units from persons with significant and high degrees of likelihood of participating in NVO. |
|
|
Needs isolation by dispersing into different units from persons with significant and high degrees of probability of participation in NVO with a forecast of the role position of an aggressor or a victim-aggressor. |
|
|
Needs significantly less supervision. |
|
|
May be considered a likely candidate for junior commander positions. |
|
Thus, the full interpretation of the research results from our first example would be:
Predicted role position “victim-aggressor” (with a predominance of aggressive traits), predisposed to suicidal actions;
The reliability of the forecast is reliable (95-98%);
Needs strict control from commanders;
Needs isolation by dispersing into different units from persons with presumptive and high degrees of probability of participating in illegal military activities;
5.13. Methodology for psychodiagnostics of suicidal intentions PSN - “A”
Psychologists identify signs of a normal healthy personality, which include:
- interest in the outside world;
- the presence of meaning in life, a certain philosophy of life that organizes and systematizes human experience;
- the existence of a hierarchy of values;
- integrity of the individual, the adequacy of her reactions to changing circumstances;
- balance of basic nervous processes (excitatory and inhibitory), adequate balance of cortical and subcortical activity;
- the ability to establish emotional contacts with others;
- compliance of human behavior with the norms and traditions established in society;
- subordination to public goals, choice of legal means to achieve personal goals, etc.
Ideal mental health is not only the absence of mental illness, but also the exclusion of any prerequisites for it. Between ideal mental health and mental illness, there are a number of intermediate states characterized by varying degrees of risk of developing mental pathology.
In this series are persons with neuropsychic instability - this is a state of mental maladjustment, which is characterized by a tendency to disrupt optimal functioning and adequate personal response under conditions of nervous tension. Prevention and early recognition of NPN is the main element of practical preventive work.
Military service is inevitably accompanied by significant mental and physical stress. A change in the rhythm of life, separation from home and family, a statutory daily routine, a regulated regime of behavior, the need to obey, increased responsibility, everyday inconveniences, various professional hazards - all this places increased demands on the state of mental and physical health.
Military personnel with low “neuro-mental stability” (NPU) are placed in a special group, since under significant physical and mental stress they may experience biologically caused breakdowns of the nervous system.
Low NPU presupposes the presence in a serviceman of various pre-morbid conditions (extreme variants of the mental norm) with a hidden, unexpressed, or moderately expressed, but compensated form of the course, caused by defects in the functioning of the nervous system and reducing the adaptive capabilities of the body.
All military personnel, in accordance with the requirements of the Main Military Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, undergo a psychological (psychophysiological) examination at the military commissariat, and then at the military unit by a group of professional psychological selection, during which their level of neuropsychic stability is determined.
In accordance with test methods developed at the State Military Medical University of the Russian Defense Ministry, military personnel are divided into 4 groups according to the level of neuropsychic stability:
Group 1 - persons with high neuropsychic stability, practically healthy. Neuropsychic breakdowns are unlikely.
Group 2 - persons with sufficient neuropsychic stability. Neuropsychic breakdowns are likely if a soldier is in an extreme situation for a long time without appropriate help.
Military personnel of groups 1 and 2 can be recommended for specialties that require increased NPU, as well as performing tasks with weapons and ammunition.
Group 3 - persons with satisfactory neuropsychic stability. Neuropsychic breakdowns are likely even if military personnel are in extreme conditions for a short time, which limits the use of these military personnel in certain specialties or in certain situations.
Military personnel of this group are not recommended for guard duty and are limitedly fit for duty as part of a daily squad. Persons of the 3rd group of NPU require individual psycho-prophylactic, corrective and educational measures, after the adoption of which, and only on a personal basis, the issue of their admission to service with weapons can be considered.
Group 4 - persons with unsatisfactory neuropsychic stability. The likelihood of breakdowns is very high even with moderate mental and physical stress. The commander, on the recommendation of a psychologist, is obliged to send these persons for consultation with medical service specialists to take measures and decide on their suitability for service in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
Military personnel of the 3rd and 4th NPU groups must be under constant dynamic supervision of military psychologists. Once every six months, individuals with low neuropsychic stability should be additionally studied and tested, and a conclusion should be made about their current condition (decrease or increase in NPU).
To identify the NPN group, it is recommended to use the “Forecast - 2” and “NPN - A” test methods. All methods used to study personnel must be previously adapted, brought into compliance with the law of normal distribution, and only then used in practice.
Identification of persons with NPD is an integral part of the work of commanders, deputies for educational work, military psychologists and doctors to study the individual psychological characteristics of personnel, preserve and strengthen the mental health of military personnel.
Measures to identify persons with NPN are carried out throughout the entire stay of military personnel in the military unit. Experience shows that the bulk of military personnel with mental disorders and mental disorders (up to 80%) are identified in the first 1-3 months after conscription, and the rest (20%) during further service. All identified military personnel must be placed under dynamic observation.
To identify military personnel with low NPN, the method of studying documents can be used. This method will give indirect signs of NPD: mental illness in parents and close relatives, previous brain injuries, observation by a psychoneurologist, upbringing in a dysfunctional family, learning difficulties, difficult relationships in a team, short temper, irritability, early addiction to alcohol, smoking, drinking drugs.
Military personnel with low NPU often experience the following in their daily activities:
- lethargy, decreased activity, exhaustion of the nervous system, tearfulness, low mood, sleep disturbance, frequent complaints of headaches, timidity, fearfulness, suspiciousness;
- irritability, short temper, impulsiveness, disturbance of rhythm and depth of breathing, hand tremors;
- slow pace of actions, obsessive thoughts and actions;
- isolation, self-absorption, strange, sometimes inexplicable actions;
These signs should serve as a signal for the commander to conduct additional examination using test techniques and other psychodiagnostic methods.
Working with military personnel of groups with NPD requires an integrated approach and constant interaction between commanders, doctors, and psychologists.
The technique contains 86 questions, to each of which the subject must answer “yes” or “no”. The results of the examination are expressed as a quantitative indicator (in points), on the basis of which a conclusion is made about the level of neuropsychic stability and the likelihood of neuropsychic breakdowns.
To conduct the survey, you must have the text of the questionnaire and registration forms. The examination lasts about 20 minutes.
Instructions for subjects
“You are asked to answer 86 questions aimed at identifying some of the characteristics of your personality. Be frank, do not think for a long time about the content of the questions, give a natural answer that first comes to your mind. Remember that there are no “good” or “bad” answers. If you answer “yes”, put a “+” (plus) sign in the corresponding cell of the registration form; if you chose the answer “no”, put a “-” (minus) sign. Make sure that the question number on the questionnaire and the cell number on the registration form match. Don’t miss out on speaking out.”
Registration form for the questionnaire “Forecast-2-02”
Full name___________________ Date of examination___________
The results of the method are processed using special “keys” (Table 1).
Table 1
Processing is carried out using “keys”, which are made in the amount of three pieces from transparent plastic (film). A grid is applied to the plastic that matches the grid of the registration form. The slots in each of the “keys” should correspond to the numbers of statements grouped into scales. One “key” is prepared for calculating points on the sincerity scale, two - on the scale of neuropsychic stability (for assessing positive and negative statements).
Processing begins with the sincerity scale, which is used to assess the reliability of the answers. The “key” is placed on the completed registration form, after which the number of minuses that are visible through the slots in the “key” is counted. The resulting number corresponds to the value of the sincerity scale in points. If a serviceman received 10 or more points, then it is not recommended to use these questionnaires, and the reasons for insincerity should be clarified during the conversation, followed by a conclusion about the level of neuropsychic stability.
Then the number of matches with the “key” is calculated on the scale of neuropsychic stability. The number of “raw points” received by a military personnel is converted into “points” according to Table 2 and assessed according to Table 3.
table 2
Table 3
Text of the questionnaire “Forecast-2-02”
1. It happened that I gave up on something I started because I was afraid that I couldn’t handle it.
2. It’s easy to argue with me.
3. I avoid correcting people who make unsubstantiated statements.
4. People show me as much sympathy and sympathy as I deserve.
5. Sometimes I am sure that other people know what I am thinking.
6. There were times when I did not keep my promises.
7. At times I am completely sure of my worthlessness.
8. I have never had any run-ins with the law.
9. I often memorize numbers that have no meaning to me (for example, car license plates, etc.).
10. Sometimes I tell lies.
11. I am more impressionable than most other people.
12. I am pleased to have significant people among my acquaintances, as it gives me weight in my own eyes.
13. Fate is definitely not kind to me.
14. People often tell me that I am short-tempered.
15. It happened that I talked about things that I don’t understand.
16. I easily lose patience with people.
17. I have no enemies who would truly want to harm me.
18. Sometimes my hearing becomes so acute that it even bothers me.
19. It happens that I put off until tomorrow what I can do today.
20. If people weren’t against me, I would have achieved much more in life.
21. In the game I prefer to win.
22. I often cross to the other side of the street to avoid meeting a person I don’t want to see.
23. Most of the time I feel like I did something wrong or even bad.
24. If someone says something stupid or otherwise shows their ignorance, I try to explain to him his mistake.
25. Sometimes I have the feeling that so many difficulties have been piled up in front of me that it is simply impossible to overcome them.
26. At a party, I behave better at the table than at home.
27. There are very nervous people in my family.
28. If someone is to blame for my failures, I will not leave him unpunished.
29. I must admit that sometimes I worry about little things.
30. When I am asked to start a discussion or express an opinion on an issue in which I have good knowledge, I do so without timidity.
31. I often make fun of my friends.
32. Throughout my life, my attitude towards my profession has changed several times.
33. It happened that when discussing some issues, I, without particularly thinking, agreed with the opinions of others.
34. I often worked under the guidance of people who knew how to turn things around in such a way that all achievements in their work were attributed to them, and others were to blame for mistakes.
35. Without any fear, I enter a room where others have already gathered and are talking.
36. It seems to me that people especially often treat me unfairly.
37. When I am in a high place, I have the urge to jump down.
38. Among my friends there are people I don’t like.
39. My plans often seemed so difficult to implement that I had to abandon them.
40. I am often absent-minded and forgetful.
41. I rarely have attacks of bad mood.
42. I would prefer to work with women.
43. I am happiest when I am alone.
44. Sometimes when I don't feel well, I get irritable.
45. I often see dreams that it’s better not to tell anyone about.
46. My beliefs and views are unshakable.
47. I am a nervous and easily excitable person.
48. It really annoys me when I forget where I put things.
49. It happens that I get angry.
50. I like work that requires close attention.
51. Sometimes I get so excited that I can’t sit still.
52. It happens that an indecent or even obscene joke makes me laugh.
53. Sometimes such bad thoughts come into my head that it’s better not to tell anyone about them.
54. Sometimes I take valerian, elenium or other sedatives.
55. I am an active person.
56. Now it’s hard for me to hope that I will achieve anything in life.
57. Sometimes I feel like I'm close to a nervous breakdown.
58. It happened that I did not answer letters immediately after reading them.
59. Once a week or more often I get excited and anxious.
60. It is very difficult for me to adapt to new living, working or studying conditions. The transition to new conditions of life, work or study seems unbearably difficult to me.
61. Sometimes it happened that I was late for work or a date.
62. I often have headaches.
63. I led the wrong lifestyle.
64. I drink alcoholic beverages in moderation (or not at all).
65. I often indulge in sad thoughts.
66. Compared to other families, there is very little love and warmth in mine.
67. I often have ups and downs in my mood.
68. When I am among people, I hear very strange things.
69. I believe that I was very often punished undeservedly.
70. I'm scared to look down from a great height.
71. It happened that I could not do anything for days or even weeks because I could not bring myself to get down to work.
72. I drink an unusual amount of water every day.
73. I have had periods when I did something and then didn’t know what exactly I was doing.
74. When I try to do something, I often notice that my hands are shaking.
75. I think that I am a doomed person.
76. I have periods of such intense anxiety that I can’t even sit still.
77. At times it seems to me that my head is working slower.
78. It seems to me that I feel everything more acutely than others.
79. Sometimes, for no reason at all, I suddenly experience a period of extraordinary cheerfulness.
80. Some things worry me so much that it’s hard for me to even talk about them.
81. Sometimes my nerves get to me.
82. I often have the feeling that everything around me is unreal.
83. When I hear about the success of a close friend, I begin to feel like I am a failure.
84. It happens that bad, often even terrible words come into my head, and I just can’t get rid of them.
86. Often, even when everything is going well for me, I feel like I don’t care.
Mental development Quantitative changes in the human psyche concept
Test for diagnosing the level of neuropsychic stability, the risk of maladaptation under stress Tests for neuropsychic stability
Outline of nodes for decorative drawing